If the WWF Living Planet Report 2018 doesn’t push the world to act, nothing will
One reason why the destruction in the name of “development” happens is that nature’s economic worth is invisible. Today, many economists are trying to point out that a nation’s progress should include its natural capital base and so there should be the valuation of the services that the world’s natural wealth provide.
The WWF Living Planet Report 2018, a science-based assessment of the health of the planet, says that global wildlife populations have fallen by 60% in just over four decades, thanks to accelerating pollution, deforestation, climate change and other man-made factors. More than 4,000 species of mammals, birds, fish, reptiles and amphibians declined rapidly between 1970 and 2014, the report said.
The report also found that 90% of seabirds have plastics in their stomachs, compared with 5% in 1960, while about half of the world’s shallow-water corals have been lost in the past three decades. Animal life dwindled the most rapidly in the tropical areas of Latin America and the Caribbean, with an 89% fall in populations since 1970, while species that rely on freshwater habitats, like frogs and river fish, declined in population by 83%. The WWF has called for an international treaty, modelled on the Paris climate agreement, to be drafted to protect wildlife and reverse human impacts on nature.
The report is alarming, and national governments, NGOs, media, and the public must shoulder the blame for failing spectacularly to initiate measures to arrest the trend even though there have been regular warnings. WWF’s 2016 report warned that global wildlife could decline by 67% by the end of this decade as a result of human activities. The 2017 UN Environment Annual Report and the 2018 Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services reports said more or less the same thing. The current efforts to protect the natural world are not keeping up with the speed of man-made destruction, and that the world is heading for an “ecological credit crunch” far worse than the current financial crisis because humans are overusing the natural resources of the planet.
This trend will continue unless human beings learn to minimise the use of resources and internalise the benefits of recycling/reuse. The nature conservation agenda is not only about securing the future of tigers, pandas, whales and all the amazing diversity of life. It’s bigger than that. There cannot be a healthy, happy and prosperous planet with a destabilised climate, depleted oceans and rivers, degraded land and empty forests, all stripped of biodiversity, the web of life that sustains us all.
One reason why the destruction in the name of “development” happens is that nature’s economic worth is invisible. Today, many economists are trying to point out that a nation’s progress should include its natural capital base; there should be a valuation of the services that the world’s natural wealth provide.
But governments and people must realise that there’s no such thing as a free lunch. They must put their weight behind the economists and scientists working to finetune standards for evaluating ecosystem services. This system of attaching a price tag is probably the only way left to sensitise human beings that all creatures great and small have some role to play in sustaining the earth’s web of life.
………………..
Earth’s wild animal population plummeted 60% in 44 years, says WWF
From 1970 to 2014, 60% of all animals with a backbone — fish, birds, amphibians, reptiles and mammals — were wiped out by human appetites and activity, according WWF’s “Living Planet” report, based on a survey of more than 4,000 species spread over 16,700 populations scattered across the globe.
“The situation is really bad, and it keeps getting worse,” WWF International Director-General Marco Lambertini told AFP. “The only good news is that we know exactly what is happening.
For freshwater fauna, the decline in population over the 44 years monitored was a staggering 80%. Regionally, Latin America was hit hardest, seeing a nearly 90% loss of wildlife over the same period.
Another dataset confirmed the depth of an unfolding mass extinction event, only the sixth in the last half-billion years.
Depending on which of Earth’s lifeforms are included, the current rate of species loss is 100 to 1,000 times higher than only a few hundred years ago, when people began to alter Earth’s chemistry and crowd other creatures out of existence.
Measured by weight, or biomass, wild animals today only account for 4% of mammals on Earth, with humans (36%) and livestock (60%) making up the rest.
The great acceleration
Ten thousand years ago that ratio was probably reversed.
“The statistics are scary,” said Piero Visconti, a researcher at the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis in Austria and one of 59 co-authors of the 80-page report. “Unlike population declines, extinctions are irreversible.”
For corals, it may already be too late.
Even if humanity manages to cap global warming at 1.5°C (2.7°F) — mission impossible, according to some scientists — coral mortality will likely be 70 to 90%..A 2°C world would be a death sentence, according to a new U.N. report.
Half-a-century of conservation efforts have scored spectacular successes, with significant recoveries among tigers, manatees, grizzly bears, bluefin tuna and bald eagles. “If we didn’t make those efforts, the situation would have been much worse,” Mr. Lambertini, the WWF chief, said.But the onslaught of hunting, shrinking habitat, pollution, illegal trade and climate change — all caused by humans — has been too much to overcome, he acknowledged. “Scientists call it the ‘great acceleration’,” he said in a phone interview. “It is the exponential growth over the last 50 years in the use of energy, water, timber, fish, food, fertiliser, pesticides, minerals, plastics — everything.”
‘New deal’ for nature
The pace of population increase — long taboo in development and conservation circles — also took off around 1950, the date scientists have chosen as the “gold spike”, or starting point, for a new geological period dubbed the Anthropocene, or “age of man”.
In looking for answers, conservationists are turning to climate change for inspiration. “We need a new global deal for nature,” said Mr. Lambertini, noting two key ingredients in the 195-nation Paris climate treaty. “One was the realisation that climate change was dangerous for the economy and society, not just polar bears,” he said.
Similarly, he argued, threatened ecosystem services long taken for granted — drinkable water, breathable air, heat-absorbing oceans, forests that soak up CO2, productive soil — are worth tens of trillions of dollars every year. “A healthy, sustainable future for all is only possible on a planet where nature thrives and forests, oceans and rivers are teeming with biodiversity and life,” said Mr. Lambertini.
The Paris Agreement, negotiated under the U.N. convention on climate change, also set a clear target: global warming must be held to “well below” 2°C, and 1.5°C if possible.
The parallel U.N. Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), by contrast, has lots of targets running out to 2020 which are not only too weak, but — with one possible exception — will probably not be met, Mr. Lambertini said. “The CBD is failing,” he told AFP. But an upcoming meeting of the 195-nation body could be the beginning of a “revolution” that will see the Convention re-engineered in 2020 into “a new deal for Nature.”
Nature under assault: key indicators
Populations crashing
- From 1970 to 2014, the number of animals with a backbone — birds, reptiles, amphibians, mammals and fish — plummeted across the globe, on average, by about 60%.
- For freshwater vertebrates, losses topped 80%. Geographically, South and Central America have been hit hardest, with 89% less wildlife in 2014 than in 1970.
- The WWF Living Planet Index tracks more than 4,000 species spread across nearly 17,000 populations.
Species disappearing
- The index of extinction risk for five major groups — birds, mammals, amphibians, corals and an ancient family of plants called cycads — shows an accelerating slide towards oblivion.
- Depending on which categories are included, the current rate at which species are going extinct is 100 to 1,000 times greater than only a few centuries ago, when human activity began to alter the planet’s biology and chemistry in earnest.
- By definition, this means that Earth has entered a mass extinction event, only the sixth in half-a-billion years.
Boundaries breached
- In 2009, scientists weighed the impact of humanity’s expanding appetites on nine processes — known as Earth systems — within nature. Each has a critical threshold, the upper limit of a “safe operating space” for our species.
- The do-not-cross red line for climate change, for example, is global warming of 1.5°C, according to a new U.N. report.
- So far, we have clearly breached two of these so-called planetary boundaries: species loss, and imbalances in Earth’s natural cycles of nitrogen and phosphorous (mainly due to fertiliser use).
- For two others, climate and land degradation, we have one foot in the red zone. Ocean acidification and freshwater supply are not far behind. As for new chemical pollutants such as endocrine disruptors, heavy metals, and plastics, we simply don’t know yet how much is too much.
- More generally, the marginal capacity of Earth’s ecosystems to renew themselves has been far outstripped by humanity’s ecological footprint, which has nearly tripled in 50 years.
Forests shrinking
- Nearly 20% of the Amazon rainforest, the world’s largest, has disappeared in five decades. Tropical deforestation continues unabated, mainly to make way for soy beans, palm oil and cattle.
- Globally, between 2000 and 2014, the world lost 920,000 sq. km of intact or “minimally disturbed” forest, an area roughly the size of Pakistan or France and Germany combined. Satellite data shows the pace of that degradation picked up by 20% from 2014 to 2016, compared with the previous 15 years.
Oceans depleted
- Since 1950, our species has extracted 6 billion tonnes of fish, crustaceans, clams, squids and other edible sea creatures. Despite the deployment of increasingly sophisticated fishing technologies, global catches — 80% by industrial fleets — peaked in 1996 and have been declining since.
- Climate change and pollution have killed off half of the world’s shallow water coral reefs, which support more than a quarter of marine life. Even if humanity manages to cap global warming at 1.5°C — which many scientists doubt is possible — coral mortality will likely be 70 to 90%.
- Coastal mangrove forests, which protect against storm surges made worse by rising seas, have also declined by up to half over the last 50 years.
इंसान ने पृथ्वी पर रहने वाले अन्य प्राणियों का जीना मुहाल कर दिया है। वर्ल्ड वाइल्ड फंड (डब्ल्यूडब्ल्यूएफ) और लंदन की जूलॉजिकल सोसायटी (ज़ेएसएल) द्वारा जारी रिपोर्ट ‘लिविंग प्लैनेट’ के मुताबिक 1970 से 2014 के बीच कशेरुकी (रीढ़ वाले) प्राणियों की 60 फीसदी आबादी खत्म हो चुकी है। 2010 तक इनकी आबादी 48 प्रतिशत बची थी। जाहिर है, इनका तेजी से खात्मा हो रहा है और इसके लिए हम जिम्मेदार हैं।
दुनिया भर के 59 विशेषज्ञों के समूह ने यह रिपोर्ट तैयार करने के लिए अपने अध्ययन में पक्षी, मछली, स्तनधारी, उभयचर और सरीसृप की अलग-अलग करीब चार हजार प्रजातियों को शामिल किया। स्टडी में पाया गया कि मनुष्य की आबादी पिछले पचास सालों में दोगुनी हुई है, जिसका असर पृथ्वी के अन्य जंतुओं पर पड़ रहा है। अफ्रीकी हाथी जैसी प्रजातियों को सबसे अधिक नुकसान हुआ है। पिछले दस साल में ही इनकी आबादी एक तिहाई कम हो गई है।
ताजे पानी में रहने वाले जीवों के लिए खतरा तेजी से बढ़ रहा है। नदियों और झीलों के प्रदूषण की वजह से 83 फीसद जलीय जीव खत्म हो चुके हैं। विशेषज्ञों ने चेतावनी दी है कि अगर इन्हें संरक्षित करने के लिए तत्काल जरूरी कदम नहीं उठाए गए तो इनकी कई और जातियां विलुप्त हो जाएंगी, जिससे मनुष्य के अस्तित्व के लिए भी खतरा पैदा हो जाएगा।
दुनिया भर के पर्यावरणवादी लगातार यह दोहराते रहते हैं कि जैव विविधता संकट में है, इसे बचाने की जरूरत है, पर हम पर्यावरण और परिवेश से संबंधित मामलों को महज एक अकादमिक बहस मानकर इनसे मुंह फेर लेते हैं, या इस पर सेमिनार, नुक्कड़ नाटक, मैराथन दौड़ आयोजित करके अपना कर्तव्य समाप्त मान लेते हैं। जबकि जैव विविधता के संरक्षण के लिए पूरी जीवन-पद्धति में बुनियादी बदलाव की जरूरत है। पर्यावरण से संबंधित जो कानून बने हैं, उनका सख्ती से पालन करना होगा। विकास योजनाओं का स्वरूप ऐसा रखना होगा, जिससे प्रकृति को कम से कम नुकसान हो।
पिछले कुछ समय से निर्माण उद्योग ने प्रकृति और पर्यावरण का सबसे ज्यादा कबाड़ा किया है। मनुष्य ने अपने रहने का तो इंतजाम कर लिया लेकिन पशु-पक्षियों को दरबदर कर दिया। शहरों का रहन-सहन ऐसा है कि गौरैया समेत कई पक्षी हमारे देखते-देखते ओझल हो गए। जाहिर है, सभ्यता के इस मोड़ पर ठहरकर सोचना होगा। मनुष्य इस पृथ्वी पर अकेले नहीं जी सकता। उसे प्राणि जगत की जरूरत है। पशुओं की प्रजातियों के खत्म होने से खाद्य श्रृंखला गड़बड़ा सकती है और दूसरे कई तरह के संकट पैदा हो सकते हैं। पशु-पक्षियों के प्राकृतिक निवास को बचाने के लिए जंगलों, नदियों और पहाड़ों का संरक्षण जरूरी है। विकास का जीडीपी-केंद्रित नजरिया इसके खिलाफ जाता है। तरक्की नापने का पैमाना हम वक्त रहते बदल सकें तो शायद कहीं कुछ उम्मीद बनती दिखे